Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent LitigationClients know WilmerHale as one of the top firms for patent litigation. We have helped companies protect their IP in jurisdictions across the US and internationally, including the International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit, the Supreme Court and all courts at the district level.Learn More
Intellectual Property Appeals
Intellectual Property AppealsTo be successful before the US Supreme Court and the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, companies require advocates with deep understanding and experience. The Federal Circuit is an extraordinarily specialized forum where firsthand experience provides a critical tactical advantage.Learn More
Post-Grant ProceedingsWe advise clients on the smartest, most cost-effective ways to challenge or defend issued patents.Learn More
Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Litigation
Hatch-Waxman and Biologics LitigationInnovation is the key to success for any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. Equally important is procuring intellectual property to safeguard those innovations and developing strategies to protect those valuable assets from unauthorized use by competitors. Our team has the litigation experience, patent proficiency and regulatory knowledge to do just that.Learn More
International Trade Commission
International Trade CommissionWhen facing an International Trade Commission (ITC) Section 337 investigation, leaders across industries turn to our seasoned litigation team for our encyclopedic knowledge of the Commission’s procedures, priorities and rulings. With the ITC’s increasing popularity as a venue for various types of intellectual property disputes, our powerhouse litigation team is imperative to the success of our clients.Learn More
Intersection of Antitrust and IP
Intersection of Antitrust and IPWilmerHale is uniquely positioned to provide counseling, strategic advice and litigation representation to clients confronting issues involving both antitrust and intellectual property law—and the intersection between the two.Learn More
Trade SecretsTrade secret theft, increasingly through cyber intrusions and hacks, can severely impact a company’s competitiveness and put domestic and international jobs at risk. The reach of trade secret theft into critical commercial and defense technologies, consumer lists and pre-patent processes poses privacy- and national security–related threats as well.Learn More
Copyright, Trademark and Trade Secrets Litigation
Copyright, Trademark and Trade Secrets LitigationThanks to a trial history that exceeds many of our competitors, we have a deep familiarity with US and international venues and a creative approach to litigation of any scope and complexity.Learn More
Future European Patent System: Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent
Future European Patent System: Unified Patent Court and Unitary PatentThe Unified Patent Court will be a single court having jurisdiction in all EU Member States that ratify the UPC Agreement. Currently, patents generally must be enforced (or revoked) separately in each European jurisdiction.Learn More
Protecting Intellectual Property in International Markets
Protecting Intellectual Property in International MarketsCompanies can face enormous negative consequences by inadequately protecting and enforcing their intellectual property. WilmerHale is well-positioned to help with these challenges, bringing to the table specialized lawyers from the patent and trademark bar who rank among the best in the world.Learn More
WilmerHale Named Patent Law Firm of the Year by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® 2021News
WilmerHale Recognized by LMG Life Sciences at Annual AwardsNews
Achieved a trial victory for Apple marking a significant milestone in the company’s seven-year fight to hold Samsung Electronics accountable for copying the original iPhone and applying patented Apple designs and features to numerous Samsung phones. After four days of deliberation, a jury awarded $539 million in damages to Apple. Apple and Samsung later announced a settlement of all remaining patent litigation between them.
Prevailed at the ITC, the U.S. district court, and then twice before the Federal Circuit on behalf of Intel, Apple, and Hewlett-Packard after X2Y Attenuators LLC claimed that Intel’s microprocessors, and the Apple and HP computers containing them, infringed multiple X2Y patents.
Won a major, complete victory for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer in one of the largest Hatch-Waxman cases ever filed. A district judge found the patents covering our clients’ blockbuster drug Eliquis® were valid and infringed by all generics challenging them. This case covered 25 generic companies and likely protects Eliquis® until at least 2031.
Earned a milestone victory for Becton Dickinson (BD) that ended an eight-year multinational patent infringement dispute with Braun Melsungen in US district court, the Federal Circuit, the PTAB and numerous jurisdictions across the globe. Eleven patents were asserted against BD in the US, and more than 60 patents in a half dozen countries were asserted outside the US. Braun ultimately settled the global dispute and gave BD a broad portfolio license.
Prevailed on behalf of Swatch Group Ltd. in a counterfeiting case against a Canal Street landlord after being brought on as counsel days before trial. Following a one-week trial, a jury unanimously found the landlord liable for contributory trademark infringement. The jury further awarded $1.1 million in damages based on the sale of a single counterfeit Omega.
Obtained a full defense verdict for Bombardier Recreational Products (BRP) defeating a $130 million trademark infringement claim brought by Jaguar Land Rover. Following an eight-day trial with 19 witnesses, the jury rendered a 7-1 verdict in BRP’s favor, finding that BRP’s Can-Am Defender off-road vehicle did not infringe Land Rover’s trademark for DEFENDER.
Achieved a noteworthy victory for Takeda's wholly owned subsidiary, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, at the Federal Circuit when the appeals court reversed a district court finding of patent invalidity based on obviousness and remanded the case with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Takeda. This Hatch-Waxman matter involved a patent owned by the US government and exclusively licensed to Takeda covering the latter’s blockbuster oncology drug Velcade® which has annual US sales in excess of $1 billion.
Earned a major win for Ancestry when a district court judge granted our motion to dismiss finding that all patent claims asserted by 23andMe were invalid because they were directed to patent ineligible subject matter. This case was the first major legal clash between the two top genetic testing companies in the country, and upon appeal to the Federal Circuit, the panel unanimously affirmed the district court’s decision.
IP Litigation Department of the Year
The American Lawyer
Consistently recognized as a top firm
Law Firm of the Year in Patent Law
U.S. News - Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms List
United States Patent Contentious Firm of the Year
- The American Lawyer – Named WilmerHale the Law Firm of the Year (2020), was honored as a finalist in the Litigation Department of the Year contest (2018) and as the IP Litigation Department of the Year (2014, 2008), and named a finalist in the IP category six times since the publication first awarded it in 2004.
- BTI Consulting Group – Named as an IP Litigation Powerhouse in the 2019 BTI Litigation Outlook (2019) and an IP Litigation Standout (2017, 2018). Recognized as the Most-Favored IP Department in the nation, as one of two firms Best at Complex IP Litigation, one of six Go To IP Litigation Firms, and one of five Go To IP Firms for non-litigation IP work in the BTI Intellectual Property Outlook (2015).
- Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers – Recognized as a leading law firm in the area of intellectual property in the US (2012–2020) and in Germany (2017) and praised as “an absolutely outstanding team that gives everything you want from a law firm.”
- Chambers UK: A Client's Guide to the UK Legal Profession – Ranked among leading firms in the UK in the intellectual property category (2021) where it is noted that the firm has a “formidable IP practice focusing on patent litigation,” and is “particularly adept at handling patent infringement disputes concerning standard-essential patents and FRAND licensing.”
- Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business – Ranked nationally in band one (2011–2020); noted as “outstanding at all levels, combining first-rate technical and legal acumen and great trial skills.” Consistently recognized in the national International Trade: IP (section 337) category (2013–2020) and in regional IP tables for Massachusetts (2003–2020), California (2012–2020), Colorado (2016–2020), New York (2012–2020) and Washington DC (2012–2020).
- IAM Patent 1000 – Ranked as a leading firm for litigation in the US and UK, and in regional US rankings in California, Colorado, the DC Metro area, Massachusetts and New York (2018–2020).
- JUVE Patent UK 2021 – Ranked as a Tier 3 firm in litigation where it is noted that the firm remains one of the most developed of any transatlantic practice.
- Lake Whillans’ The Life Sciences Law Firm Index – Included among top three best life sciences law firms (2016, 2017), as the top firm for startup work (2017), among the top 10 deal firms (2017), the top two patent law firms (2016) and top 10 firms for thought leadership (2016).
- Law360 – Listed among the top five “go-to” firms for PTAB litigation (2012–2019) and among Law360’s IP Groups of the Year (2010–2011, 2013–2014) and Technology Groups of the Year (2016–2018).
- The Legal 500 United States – Named among the top law firms for intellectual property (2011-2020) and as the Best Law Firm in the IP: Patent Litigation category (2014).
- LMG Life Sciences – Recognized in the areas of general patent litigation, Hatch-Waxman patent litigation, patent prosecution, patent strategy and management, corporate, licensing and collaboration, M&A, venture capital and white collar/government investigations (2012–2019).
- LMG Life Sciences Awards – Named as the General Patent Litigation Firm of the Year and Intellectual Property Firm of the Year and shortlisted for the Hatch-Waxman Litigation (Branded) Firm of the Year, Inter Partes Review Firm of the Year and US Life Cycle Firm of the Year (2019); and received the Impact Case of the Year Award for our work on Enzo Life Sciences v. Roche Molecular Systems (2020) and the Hatch-Waxman Impact Case of the Year Award for our role in Millennium Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz (2018).
- Managing IP North America Awards – Named as 2020 Patent Contentious Firm of the Year for the Northeast region and recognized with the Impact Case of the Year Award for our role in Mission Products Holdings Inc v. Tempnology LLC; named as the US Patent Contentious Firm of the Year or shortlisted for the recognition for nine consecutive years (2011–2019).
- Managing IP, IP Stars – Named among the top US firms for intellectual property (2011–2020) with 20 partners individually recognized in the 2020 edition.
- New York Law Journal – Recognized as Intellectual Property Litigation Department of the Year (2018).
- National Law Journal – Recognized as the Washington DC Litigation Department of the Year in the General Litigation category (2017) and IP category (2014); and among the IP Hot List each of the five years the contest was held (2012–2016).
- The Business Journals – Consistently featured on the Largest IP Law Firms Lists in Boston and Silicon Valley.
- U.S. News - Best Lawyers® – Named Patent Firm of the Year (2021), Biotechnology Law Firm of the Year (2020) and IP Litigation Law Firm of the Year (2018). Honored with first-tier national “Best Law Firm” rankings in Patent Law, Biotechnology Law, IP Litigation and Patent Litigation; and first-tier metropolitan rankings in Washington DC and San Jose for IP Litigation; in Boston for Copyright Law, Patent Law, Patent Litigation, IP Litigation and Trademark Law; in Colorado for Patent Law; and in New York for Biotechnology Law (2013–2020).