WilmerHale's IP Litigation Practice features a premier litigation team backed by the academic and industry experience of more than 120 lawyers and technology specialists with scientific or technical degrees.

Named an IP Litigation Department of the Year finalist by The American Lawyer in 2016, our lawyers have tried major cases in federal district courts throughout the United States, the US International Trade Commission, and in Germany and the UK. We also regularly represent clients in patent appeals before the United States Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit.

Contacts

Sort By
Steinberg, Donald R.

Donald R. Steinberg

Chair, Intellectual Property Department

+1 617 526 6453 (t)

don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com

Pirozzolo, Lisa J.

Lisa J. Pirozzolo

Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Group

+1 617 526 6388 (t)

lisa.pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com

Selwyn, Mark D.

Mark D. Selwyn

Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Group

+1 650 858 6031 (t)

mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com

Bassett, David B.

David B. Bassett

Partner

+1 212 230 8858 (t)

david.bassett@wilmerhale.com

Cook, Trevor

Trevor Cook

Partner

+1 212 230 8826 (t)

trevor.cook@wilmerhale.com

Dichiara, Peter M.

Peter M. Dichiara

Partner

+1 617 526 6466 (t)

peter.dichiara@wilmerhale.com

Dowd, James M.

James M. Dowd

Partner

+1 213 443 5309 (t)

james.dowd@wilmerhale.com

Elliott_Tara_lo.jpg

Tara D. Elliott

Partner

+1 202 663 6748 (t)

tara.elliott@wilmerhale.com

Ferrera, Vinita

Vinita Ferrera

Partner

+1 617 526 6208 (t)

vinita.ferrera@wilmerhale.com

Flanagan, Mark D.

Mark D. Flanagan

Partner

+1 650 858 6047 (t)

mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com

Galvin, Robert M.

Robert M. Galvin

Partner

+1 650 858 6017 (t)

robert.galvin@wilmerhale.com

Publications & News

View

April 28, 2016

Broadest Reasonable Interpretation and Claim Amendments in Post-Grant Patent Challenges

Monica Grewal and Michael Smith, in an article published in the American Constitution Society's (ACS) blog, discuss the recent debate over whether the Patent Office should apply BRI or Phillips constructions in post-grant proceedings.

April 28, 2016

Nina Tallon Named an Intellectual Property Rising Star by Law360

WilmerHale Partner Nina Tallon is one of only 10 attorneys nationwide named a 2016 Intellectual Property Rising Star by Law360 and one among four WilmerHale partners selected to this year's overall list.

April 22, 2016

Felicia Ellsworth Named a Trial Rising Star by Law360

WilmerHale Partner Felicia Ellsworth is one of only five attorneys nationwide named a 2016 Trial Rising Star by Law360. This annual competition honors the top legal talent under 40 years old.

April 20, 2016

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Patent Certiorari Petitions Denied in 2016

WilmerHale compiles lists of certiorari petitions that raise patent-law issues. This page contains a consolidated list of all recently denied petitions, organized in reverse chronological order by date of certiorari petition.

April 20, 2016

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Patent Certiorari Petitions Granted

WilmerHale compiles lists of certiorari petitions that raise patent-law issues. This page contains a consolidated list of all recently granted petitions, organized in reverse chronological order by date of certiorari petition.

April 20, 2016

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Patent Certiorari Petitions Pending

WilmerHale compiles lists of certiorari petitions that raise patent-law issues. This page contains a consolidated list of all pending petitions, organized in reverse chronological order by date of certiorari petition.

April 15, 2016

Strategic Considerations of Estoppel for IPRs After Shaw Industries Group v. Automated Creel Systems

In this article published in Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, David Cavanaugh and John Polley discuss how the Federal Circuit's recent opinion in Shaw Industries Group v. Automated Creel Systems may have important implications for the decision to pursue an IPR proceeding.

April 13, 2016

Precedent, Persuasion, and the PTAB

In this article published by the ABA's Landslide Magazine in its March/April 2016 edition, David Cavanaugh and Chief Patent Counsel of United Patents Inc. Jonathan Stroud explore the precedential value of PTAB decisions and how they might bind the PTAB and others in subsequent matters.

April 12, 2016

Context Is Everything: Evaluating Different Approaches Toward Attorneys’ Fees Awards Under Copyright Act in Light of Supreme Court Review

An article by Natalie Hanlon Leh and Laura Goodall, published in Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, looks at relevant data for attorneys' fees awards in copyright law and provides a comparison and contrast to the attorneys' fees award standards and considerations in patent and trademark law.

April 7, 2016

Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the PTAB Take Effect May 2, 2016

The US Patent and Trademark Office has announced amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that will take effect on May 2, 2016. The amendments generally adopt the rules proposed by the Patent Office on August 20, 2015, but the final rules have several differences of potential importance.

Patent Certiorari Petitions

WilmerHale compiles lists of certiorari petitions that raise patent-law issues. This page contains a consolidated list of all recently pending, granted and denied petitions, organized in each listing in reverse chronological order by date of certiorari petition.

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Certiorari Petitions Pending

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Certiorari Petitions Granted

Patent Law and the Supreme Court: Certiorari Petitions Denied

For more information on these petitions or other patent appeal matters, contact:

Joseph J. Mueller (+1 617 526 6396, joseph.mueller@wilmerhale.com)
Thomas G. Saunders (+1 202 663 6536, thomas.saunders@wilmerhale.com)
Leslie Pearlson (+1 617 526 6809, leslie.pearlson@wilmerhale.com)