Massachusetts DOR Revises Its Proposed Directive on Restrictions on Pledges of Security Corporation Stock

Massachusetts DOR Revises Its Proposed Directive on Restrictions on Pledges of Security Corporation Stock

Publication

Related Solutions

A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.
A deep and diverse practice focused on maximizing tax efficiencies and minimizing tax risks for clients nationally and internationally.
WilmerHale lawyers have decades of experience advising public and private companies in all aspects of mergers and acquisitions.
With a team of lawyers recognized nationally as leading practitioners in the field, we regularly advise public and private companies, their shareholders and their key employees on tax aspects of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and joint ventures. Clients rely on our advice to maximize their tax efficiencies and minimize their tax risks. Our clients include businesses from a wide range of sectors: technology, life sciences, publishing, telecommunications, aviation and defense, venture capital and private equity. We develop tax-efficient structures that help clients achieve business objectives and negotiate appropriate contractual protections against the assumption of unwanted tax risks.
Clients turn to our seasoned team of attorneys—strategically located across the United States—to resolve nearly any state or local tax challenge. State and local taxes account for a high percentage of most businesses’ tax burden. There are literally thousands of these taxes that companies may or may not be subject to, depending on the nature of a given transaction and the requirements of various taxing authorities. The application of historical tests to determine whether a business is subject to state or local tax jurisdictions and the extent of its tax liability has become more difficult with the explosive growth of e-commerce, and the rules are sometimes counterintuitive and seemingly contradictory. We have structured our state and local tax practice to help clients across the United States successfully cope with the specific requirements of individual jurisdictions.
WilmerHale has defended clients in hundreds of class, derivative, shareholder and individual actions alleging securities fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and other corporate misconduct.

Companies with Massachusetts security corporation subsidiaries are often asked by lenders to pledge as security for a loan their shares of stock in the security corporation subsidiaries. To qualify as a security corporation, a corporation must be classified as such by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) and must engage exclusively in buying, selling, dealing in, or holding securities on its own behalf. The DOR, in a draft Directive released on September 30, 2011, announced proposed limitations on the ability of a shareholder (such as a parent corporation) to pledge as security for a loan the stock of a security corporation. As a result of comments received by the DOR, it released on April 6, 2012 a substantially revised draft of its proposed Directive.

Under the revised draft Directive, a pledge of the shares of stock in a security corporation as security or collateral for a loan to a shareholder, in and of itself, will not preclude or revoke security corporation status. Also, the shareholder's restrictive covenants accompanying such pledge will not endanger security corporation status as long as such covenants merely limit the security corporation to investment activities permissible for a security corporation. Examples of permissible and impermissible covenants are contained in the draft Directive. The draft confirms that a security corporation may not guarantee or pledge its assets as security for a loan to a shareholder.

The DOR has requested that comments be submitted by April 25, 2012.

Authors

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.

I Accept Cancel