The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC

The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC

Publication

Related Solutions

WilmerHale offers one of the world’s premier international arbitration and dispute resolution practices.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.

Counsel Cem Kalelioğlu co-authored an article published in IPRax. The article analyzes the UK Supreme Court’s decision in UniCredit v RusChemAlliance [2024] UKSC 30 and addresses two main themes of the Supreme Court’s decision – (i) anti-suit injunctions against Russian courts’ assumption of jurisdiction despite the existence of a valid arbitration agreement; and (ii) the law governing the arbitration agreement.

See Scherer M, Jensen O and Kalelioğlu C, ‘The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC’ [2025] IPRax 200-211

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.

I Accept Cancel