The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC

The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC

Publication

Related Solutions

We provide sophisticated representation to companies, sovereign states,  state-owned enterprises, and individuals in virtually all forms of  international arbitration and dispute resolution.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.

Counsel Cem Kalelioğlu co-authored an article published in IPRax. The article analyzes the UK Supreme Court’s decision in UniCredit v RusChemAlliance [2024] UKSC 30 and addresses two main themes of the Supreme Court’s decision – (i) anti-suit injunctions against Russian courts’ assumption of jurisdiction despite the existence of a valid arbitration agreement; and (ii) the law governing the arbitration agreement.

See Scherer M, Jensen O and Kalelioğlu C, ‘The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC’ [2025] IPRax 200-211

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.

I Accept Cancel