WilmerHale Included in Daily Journal’s 2012 List of "Top Verdicts"

WilmerHale Included in Daily Journal’s 2012 List of "Top Verdicts"

Recognition

The Daily Journal has named two of WilmerHale's significant 2012 client victories to their "Top Verdicts" list, calling attention to California's most widely-watched rulings of the year. Recognized for being closely followed and examined across the nation, the cases, Apple v. Samsung and Mformation v. Research in Motion were featured in the Daily Journal's February 13, 2013 issue.

Apple v. Samsung was a well-known global patent fight which secured victories on multiple fronts. Apple defeated all of Samsung's claims of infringement and obtained a jury award of more than $1 billion on Apple's claims. The WilmerHale team representing Apple was led by Partner and former Co-managing Partner of WilmerHale Bill Lee, Partner and Palo Alto office Partner-in-Charge Mark Selwyn and Partners Joe Mueller, Peter J. Kolovos, S. Calvin Walden and Lauren B. Fletcher.

Mformation v. Research in Motion resulted in an overturn verdict of $147.2 million patent infringement against Research in Motion-stating that the company did not infringe Mformation Technologies Inc.'s device management technology as they had claimed. The WilmerHale team representing Research in Motion was led by partners Mark Matuschak and Andrew Grossman with a team that included Partners Cynthia Vreeland, David Cavanaugh and Evelyn Mak, Counsel Larissa Park, Senior Associate Erin Greenfield Mehta, Associate Aaron Thompson, and former associate Meng Xi. To learn more about this verdict, read "$147M Verdict Against Research In Motion is Overturned."

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.