Motion to Reopen Judgment in Monsanto Case is Denied

Motion to Reopen Judgment in Monsanto Case is Denied

Client News

Related Solutions

Providing comprehensive solutions for the acquisition, enforcement and protection of IP.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.

By patenting their innovations, our clients increase the value of their intellectual property and enhance their ability to compete in the marketplace. We work with laboratory and research teams and R&D and product development groups to determine whether, when and where it is in our clients’ business and technical interests to seek patent protection. And we don’t just file patent applications. Drawing on our experience with patent litigation, corporate financings and technology transactions, we implement IP strategies that conserve resources, add measurable value and give our clients a cost-effective and commercially practical competitive edge.

We help clients obtain more than 750 US and foreign patents each year, covering innovations that span the technological spectrum, including aerospace, biochemistry, biotechnology, business methods, chemistry, computer science, fuel cells, genetics, high-speed data communication, integrated circuits, materials science, medical devices, nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals, semiconductor devices and processes, and software.

We also prepare and prosecute patent applications internationally under the Patent Cooperative Treaty and by working with a network of seasoned patent lawyers around the world. Our experience extends to appeals, interferences and opposition proceedings within the US Patent and Trademark Office, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the European Patent Office.

Clients trust us to protect their most important intellectual property matters.

The Federal Circuit has rejected an attempt to reopen a judgment in a case in which Monsanto secured more than $2 million in damages based on infringement of its biotechnology patents.

Monsanto originally sued Kem Ralph for infringement of its patents and for breach of a licensing agreement. Monsanto prevailed in district court and was awarded over $2 million in patent infringement damages. Last year, WilmerHale represented Monsanto during the appeal of that damage award and won an affirmance. While that appeal was pending, Ralph filed a motion to reopen the judgment in the district court, arguing, based on supposedly newly discovered evidence, that the district judge should have recused himself from the case. After the district court denied that motion, Ralph appealed to the Federal Circuit, arguing that all of the trial judge's decisions should be vacated and the case remanded to a different judge. Seth Waxman argued the case before the Federal Circuit on February 9, 2005, and less than one week later, the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the district court's decision.

The team on this case was Seth P. Waxman, Paul R.Q. Wolfson and Edward N. Siskel.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.

I Accept Cancel