People

Paul R.Q. Wolfson

Partner

Vice Chair, Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice Group

Wolfson, Paul R.Q.

Paul Wolfson is a partner in the firm's Litigation/Controversy Department, and a vice chair of the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice Group. He is also a member of the Government and Regulatory Litigation Practice Group. He rejoined the firm in 2002.

Practice

Mr. Wolfson's practice focuses on Supreme Court and appellate litigation, and on advising clients on complex issues of federal law.

Mr. Wolfson has argued 21 cases in the United States Supreme Court and has also argued before seven federal courts of appeals. He is a member of the ABA Standing Committee on Federal Judicial Improvements, and served for two years as a member of an ABA Presidential Task Force on Federal Pleading Standards, examining the effect of the Twombly and Iqbal decisions. He also served two terms on the District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility. Before rejoining the firm, Mr. Wolfson worked for eight years in the Solicitor General’s Office, where he received the Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award for “exemplary representation of the United States before the Supreme Court.” After law school, he clerked for Supreme Court Justice Byron White.

Since returning to WilmerHale, Mr. Wolfson has represented parties and amici curiae in dozens of Supreme Court cases, including Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District (Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment); Messerschmidt v. Millender (Fourth Amendment); FCC v. Fox Broadcasting Co. (First Amendment challenge to FCC's indecency policy); Bowman v. Monsanto Co. (patent exhaustion);Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC (preemption under FIFRA); Watson v. Philip Morris Companies (federal removal jurisdiction); McConnell v. FEC (constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act), and Boumediene v. Bush (challenging the detention of enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay).

In the courts of appeals and district courts, Mr. Wolfson has a diverse practice, including several universities and governmental entities. He has represented a leading university against efforts to attach antiquities in its collection, another leading university against challenges to its plans for expansion of its campus, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in defending its landmark fiscal-stabilization program, the State of Georgia in litigation over the water supply for the metropolitan Atlanta region, and a federal agency in challenging sanctions imposed under Rule 11.

Mr. Wolfson has also represented numerous parties in patent litigation, including Monsanto Company in several successful defenses against challenges to its patents on genetically modified soybeans. He successfully represented Rambus Inc. in its challenge to a ruling of the Federal Trade Commission that Rambus had violated the antitrust laws. And, he represented a Washington DC real estate developer in litigation in the DC trial and appellate courts over a shopping mall in Georgetown.

Mr. Wolfson is active in pro bono matters. In recent Supreme Court cases he has represented a Los Angeles family whose house was searched pursuant to an invalid warrant, and a group of scientists challenging a government background investigation. He successfully represented Planned Parenthood of Central North Carolina in a challenge to a state statute that barred funding to that organization, and obtained withholding of deportation for a Cameroonian dissident. He also represented the Texas chapter of the NAACP defending the constitutionality of the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act.

Honors & Awards

Publications & News

View

January 30, 2014

Law360 Selects WilmerHale as “Appellate Practice Group of the Year” for Third Consecutive Year

WilmerHale’s Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice was named by Law360 as “Appellate Practice Group of the Year” for 2013.

January 23, 2014

Significant Patent Case Ruling by Supreme Court a Win for WilmerHale

On January 22, 2014, the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of WilmerHale client Medtronic Inc., in Medtronic Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, L.L.C.—the first patent decision of the court's 2013 Term.

January 22, 2014

WilmerHale Appellate Team Secures Supreme Court Victory in Hawaii Reapportionment Case

Members of WilmerHale's Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice received a favorable decision for their client, the Chief Election Officer of the State of Hawaii et al., in Kostick v. Nago, No. 13-456.

November 21, 2013

WilmerHale Ranks Among Financial Times' Top 40 US Innovative Lawyers in 2013

The Financial Times featured WilmerHale's successful representation of Monsanto Company in the US Innovative Lawyers 2013 ranking and awards report released on November 21, 2013.

July 19, 2013

WilmerHale Hosts Pro Bono Client, Elevator Repair Service, in New York Office

WilmerHale hosted an exclusive sneak preview of Arguendo, the latest work in progress by the award-winning Elevator Repair Service, in its New York office on July 16. Arguendo is a lively performance of the oral argument delivered in the 1991 First Amendment case Barnes v. Glen Theatre.

June 26, 2013

WilmerHale Plays Key Role in Historic Supreme Court Ruling Favoring Marriage Equality

May 31, 2013

Fourteen WilmerHale Partners Named as 2013-14 IP Stars by Managing IP

Managing IP magazine, a Euromoney Legal Media Group publication, has released its inaugural edition of IP Stars—a guidebook that identifies the leading IP firms and lawyers in the United States. WilmerHale is among the top nationally ranked firms in the guide and is rated highly in multiple states.

May 24, 2013

Chambers USA 2013 Final Results Announced

Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business today announced its final rankings for the 2013 edition, in which 93 WilmerHale lawyers and 44 firm practice areas have been recognized as leading in their field.

May 13, 2013

Supreme Court Affirms Support for WilmerHale Client in Bowman v. Monsanto Ruling

WilmerHale secured a victory for client Monsanto Co. in a significant patent law case decided today by the United States Supreme Court.

April 15, 2013

Q&A With WilmerHale's Paul Wolfson

An article featuring Paul Wolfson in Law360's 2013 Q&A Series for Appellate.

Professional Activities

  • American Bar Association
  • District of Columbia Bar Association
  • American Bar Association Standing Committee on Federal Judicial Improvements
  • Chair, Amicus Brief Committee, ABA Individual Rights and Responsibilities Section

Practices

Skip Navigation Links.

Education

JD, Yale Law School, 1987, Notes Editor, Yale Law Journal

MPhil, University of Cambridge, Trinity College, 1984, Phi Beta Kappa

AB, magna cum laude, Harvard University, 1982

Bar Admissions

District of Columbia

United States Supreme Court