WilmerHale Earns Win at Federal Circuit on Behalf of Takeda in Hatch-Waxman Litigation

WilmerHale Earns Win at Federal Circuit on Behalf of Takeda in Hatch-Waxman Litigation

Firm News

On July 17, 2017, WilmerHale achieved a significant victory for Takeda's wholly owned subsidiary, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., at the Federal Circuit when the appeals court reversed a district court finding of patent invalidity based on obviousness and remanded the case with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Takeda.

This Hatch-Waxman matter involved a patent owned by the United States government and exclusively licensed to Takeda covering the latter's blockbuster oncology drug Velcade®. In 2016, sales of Velcade in the United States were in excess of $1 billion. Generic drug manufacturers including Sandoz filed ANDAs seeking to market generic versions of Velcade and Takeda filed suit for patent infringement in the US District Court for the District of Delaware. In reversing the lower court's ruling, the appeals court found that the asserted claims were directed to the mannitol ester of bortezomib—“a new compound with distinct chemical properties”—and that these claims were not obvious because “the prior art contains no teaching or suggestion of this new compound” or that “such a new compound would have the long-sought properties of stability and solubility, and sufficiently dissociate to release bortezomib at an effective rate in the bloodstream, all critical to effective use for treating multiple myeloma.”

The WilmerHale team representing Takeda included Partners Bill Lee, Rob Galvin, Lisa Pirozzolo, Mark Fleming, Emily Whelan and Vinita Ferrera, Counsel Jason Liss, Anna Lumelsky, Tasha Bahal and Jon Roses, and Senior Associate Samantak Ghosh.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.