Evolution & Current State of Patent Eligibility of Biotech Innovations

Evolution & Current State of Patent Eligibility of Biotech Innovations

Virtual
Speaking Engagement

The evolving landscape of biotech patent law presents ongoing challenges, particularly for innovations involving recombinant nucleic acids and biological sequences. A recent ruling in REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Therapeutics by the US District Court for the District of Delaware highlights these issues, as Judge Richard Andrews ruled that merely combining natural AAV sequences with heterologous non-AAV sequences in a cultured host cell—without further modifications—does not satisfy patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

On Tuesday, April 15, WilmerHale Partner Omar Khan will join Christen DiPetrillo, Head of Intellectual Property, and Kevin Marks, Chief Legal Officer at the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, for Biocom California’s joint meeting of the IP and Cellular Gene Therapy Committees. Together, they will lead a discussion exploring the history of biotech patent eligibility, the reasoning behind the REGENXBIO court’s decision (including its reliance on the Funk Brothers precedent), and implications for innovation in gene therapy and biotech patent strategies.

Read More About the Event

Speakers

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.