Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?

Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?

Publication
WilmerHale’s Nana Wilberforce, Leon Greenfield and Álvaro Mateo Alonso authored a chronicle for Competition Policy International, “Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?”  

Excerpt: The US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have recently announced an aggressive approach to enforcing Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which (with some exceptions) absolutely prohibits director or officer interlocks between competing corporations. This article describes Section 8’s statutory text and considers the harms to competition Section 8 seeks to prevent; outlines the U.S. agencies expanded approach to enforcement; describes how the statute’s boundaries may be tested and some recurring unsettled issues; and contributes a few thoughts regarding the future of Section 8 enforcement. Although a more aggressive approach to Section 8 enforcement can bring benefits in some circumstances, it is important that the agencies respect the limits of the statute and do not overreach.

Read the full Competition Policy International Chronicle.

Authors

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.