Laupheimer_Madeleine

Madeleine C. Laupheimer

Counsel

Madeleine Laupheimer represents a variety of clients in intellectual property litigation matters. Her practice includes litigation before federal district courts, appellate courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Laupheimer was a law clerk to the Honorable Richard G. Taranto of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Honorable F. Dennis Saylor, IV of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. As a law student, Ms. Laupheimer served as an articles editor of the Stanford Law Review and participated in the Juelsgaard Intellectual Property & Innovation Clinic, where she drafted an amicus brief filed in the Federal Circuit and another filed in the Supreme Court. Ms. Laupheimer has a bachelor’s degree in chemistry, and prior to law school she worked as an associate technologist in the Advanced Battery Group of TIAX LLC.

Recognition

  • Selected for inclusion in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for intellectual property litigation (2024-2026) and appellate practice (2026).

Insights & News

Credentials

  • Education

    • JD, Stanford University Law School, 2016

      Articles Committee Editor, Stanford Law Review
    • BA, Chemistry, minor in Linguistics, Swarthmore College, 2010

      with High Honors Phi Beta Kappa
  • Admissions

    • Massachusetts

    • US Patent and Trademark Office

  • Clerkships

    • The Hon. F. Dennis Saylor IV, US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 2017 - 2018

    • The Hon. Richard G. Taranto, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016 - 2017

Credentials

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.