PTAB/USPTO Update - October 2020

PTAB/USPTO Update - October 2020

Publication

Authors

USPTO News

  • The PTAB has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows any member of the public to nominate any PTAB decision for precedential or informative designation.
  • USPTO Director Andrei Iancu announced that, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the growth of patent application filings is lower than expected and requests for continued examination and maintenance fee collections are lower than last year.

Notices, Guidance, and Requests

Final Rules

Interim Rules

  • There are no new interim rules.

Proposed Rules

PTAB Decisions

  • New Precedential PTAB Decisions
  • There are no new precedential PTAB decisions.
  • New Informative PTAB Decisions
  • There are no new informative PTAB decisions.
  • New PTAB Decisions of Note
  • RPX Corp. v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC, IPR2015-01750, Paper 128; IPR2015-01751, Paper 128; IPR2015-01752, Paper 126 (October 2, 2020), [Real Party-in-Interest - On remand from the Federal Circuit, the PTAB issued an IPR termination decision authored by Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott Boalick. The decision considers issues identified by the Federal Circuit and additional evidence admitted subsequent to the Federal Circuit decision to determine the entities that should have been identified as real parties-in-interest. The panel found that Salesforce is a real party-in-interest along with RPX and, because Salesforce was time-barred, the Petitions were time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) and terminated.]

Authors

More From This Series

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.