Supreme Court Upholds Implied Certification Liability, While Emphasizing Materiality Requirement

Supreme Court Upholds Implied Certification Liability, While Emphasizing Materiality Requirement

Publication

Authors Jonathan G. Cedarbaum, Karen F. Green and David W. Ogden explain the US Supreme Court's recent unanimous decision to uphold the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act and discuss the implications for future False Claims Act cases; published in the August 2016 edition of Pratt's Government Contracting Law Report, Vol. 2, No. 8.

In Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, the US Supreme Court unanimously upheld the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), while emphasizing that only material misrepresentations are actionable. In particular, the Court held that liability can attach if the defendant submits a claim for payment that makes “specific representations about the goods or services provided, but knowingly fails to disclose the defendant's noncompliance with a statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirement,” which the defendant “knows is material to the Government's payment decision.” Read the full article

Authors

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.