Mark Selwyn Named a 2021 “Top Intellectual Property Lawyer” by Daily Journal

Mark Selwyn Named a 2021 “Top Intellectual Property Lawyer” by Daily Journal

Recognition

Palo Alto-based Mark Selwyn has been named to the Daily Journal’s list of Top Intellectual Property Lawyers. This list honors lawyers in California who have achieved exceptional accomplishments in the field, played a role in helping advance technological innovation, and handled work critical to the entertainment, medical and technology industries.

This year’s edition marks Selwyn’s twelfth appearance on the list. Selwyn is co-chair of the firm’s IP Litigation Practice, and his specialties include defending against assertions of standard essential patents in the US and globally.

Selwyn’s profile highlights one of his closely watched matters, involving a government agency. Selwyn is representing a group of technology companies in their lawsuit against Andrei Iancu, former director of the US Patent and Trademark Office, in a challenge to the director’s discretionary authority in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Daily Journal noted that this particular matter stands out because “it is an effort to abolish the NHK-Fintiv rule, established by Iancu, that lets the PTAB decline to review a patent based on the progress of a parallel infringement case in a federal court or other agency.” Selwyn and team argues that the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and it defeats the purpose of IPR.

“The case is about a rule used by the director to deny others meritorious IPRs, and it’s used often enough that the companies we represent thought it worthwhile to challenge,” says Selwyn.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.