WilmerHale Represents BRP in Defeating Jaguar Land Rover’s $130M Trademark Challenge

WilmerHale Represents BRP in Defeating Jaguar Land Rover’s $130M Trademark Challenge

Firm News

Related Solutions

Clients trust us to protect their most important intellectual property matters.
Battle-tested. Globally Respected.

Today, BRP won the United States trademark case brought against it by Jaguar Land Rover Limited concerning BRP’s Can-Am Defender utility-recreation side-by-side. In 2016, Land Rover sued BRP seeking $130 million in damages, alleging that BRP’s Can-Am Defender infringed Land Rover’s United States trademark rights on “Defender.” After an eight-day trial, a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan rejected Land Rover’s infringement claim.

“We are pleased that the jury recognized the Can-Am Defender as a unique and distinctive product,” said Martin Langelier, senior vice president, general counsel and public affairs at BRP. 

In 1992, Land Rover obtained a trademark for the name “Defender” for “motor land vehicles, namely station wagons.” In 2015, BRP introduced the Can-Am Defender side-by-side vehicle, and the jury found that consumers would not be confused between the Land Rover Defender and the Can-Am Defender. 

BRP was represented by Louis Tompros and Colleen McCullough of WilmerHale, Dean Amburn and Lina Asmar of Giroux Amburn, and Yves St. Arnaud of BRP. 

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.

I Accept Cancel