Becton Dickinson Receives Successful Inter Partes Review Decision

Becton Dickinson Receives Successful Inter Partes Review Decision

Firm News

On September 25, 2014, WilmerHale client, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), earned a significant victory in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) before the US Patent Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) in the form of a Final Written Decision declaring unpatentable all challenged claims of US Pat. No. 5,704,914 (the '914 patent). The Decision came as the result of a suit filed against BD by One StockDuq in December 2012, which alleged that two families of BD catheters—Nexiva™ and Insyte™ Autoguard™ BC—infringed the '914 Patent. 

This successful IPR was filed by WilmerHale on behalf of BD on April 4, 2013, which marked the first time that BD had used an IPR as part of a litigation strategy. The team then requested a stay of the litigation the very next day, which the judge denied. On October 1, 2013, the Board entered a Decision on Institution determining that there was a reasonable likelihood that the challenged claims were invalid. The district court judge granted a renewed motion to stay the district court case. 

After oral arguments on July 7, 2014, the Final Written Decision was entered by the Board on September 25, 2014. The district court is now in the process of determining the future of the district court action.  

The WilmerHale team representing BD on this matter includes Partners William McElwain and David Cavanaugh, Special Counsel Heath Brooks, Senior Associate Heather Petruzzi, Associate Rob Arcamona and former Counsel Stuart Allen.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.