FRAND Damages: Comparing the Four Leading Cases, Including CSIRO

FRAND Damages: Comparing the Four Leading Cases, Including CSIRO

Speaking Engagement

This month the Federal Circuit issued its decision in CSIRO v. Cisco that agreed-in-part and disagreed-in-part with the district court's damages award regarding a patent essential to a WiFi standard. During this event, speakers will compare CSIRO with three key earlier opinions that give insight into proving and determining a reasonable royalty for a standard essential patent (SEP): the Federal Circuit's earlier decision in Ericsson v. D-Link, the Ninth Circuit's decision in Microsoft v. Motorola, and Judge Holderman's Northern District of Illinois decision in In Re Innovatio IP Ventures.

The panel, which includes WilmerHale Partner Tim Syrett, will discuss where the opinions converge and the nuances in how they differ, and how courts are likely to view these issues in the future.

Read More About the Event

Speakers

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.