Recognition of Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Ch. 15 After Purdue

Recognition of Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Ch. 15 After Purdue

Publication

Partners Benjamin Loveland and George Shuster authored a chapter in the October issue of The American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, where they discuss the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma LP on nonconsensual third-party releases in chapter 15 cases. They examine two recent decision within this lens and the developments that could still arise from this evolving area of case law. 

Excerpt: "The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma LP has, in many respects, changed the landscape for nonconsensual third-party releases in chapter 11 cases. What effect, if any, has Purdue had on the viability of such releases in chapter 15 cases? As two recent decisions suggest, perhaps not much, and those decisions provide far more flexibility for nonconsensual third-party releases in chapter 15 than the Supreme Court allows in chapter 11."

View the full article.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.