Tui v Griffiths: The Importance of Putting Your Case to Witnesses and Experts in Cross-Examination

Tui v Griffiths: The Importance of Putting Your Case to Witnesses and Experts in Cross-Examination

Publication

In an article published in Wolters Kluwer, Counsel Matteo Angelini discusses the scope of application of the rule in Browne v Dunn in international arbitration and offers lessons for practitioners.

Excerpt: “The applicability of the rule in Browne v Dunn in international arbitration remains controversial. This is because the customary approach to the taking of evidence in international arbitration does not lend itself well its application. There is a tendency towards chess-clock proceedings in international arbitration, which means that hearings are shorter with limited time for cross-examination. Those who argue against its application in arbitration point out that the rule cannot be fairly applied when a counsel is pressed for time, or has run out of time.”

Read the full article. 

 

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link. (The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.