Rethinking ‘Pathological’ Arbitration Clauses: Validating Imperfect Arbitration Agreements

Rethinking ‘Pathological’ Arbitration Clauses: Validating Imperfect Arbitration Agreements

Publication

Gary Born, Matteo Angelini and Carina Alcoberro Llivina consider a number of recent decisions concerning allegedly “pathological” arbitration clauses in a chapter appearing in Finances in International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum Patricia Shaughnessy (2019, Wolters Kluwer). 

The authors observe that the term “pathological clause” may now be a misnomer in light of the modern trend in national courts, which is to apply a validation principle to give effect to commercial parties’ dominant intention to resolve their international disputes by arbitration, notwithstanding errors or defects in expressing the particular means of dispute resolution.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.