WilmerHale Secures Pro Bono Victory With Tankleff’s Voided Conviction

WilmerHale Secures Pro Bono Victory With Tankleff’s Voided Conviction

Client News
The Appellate Division of State Supreme Court in Brooklyn, New York today overturned the convictions of Martin Tankleff—a Long Island man who has been imprisoned for 17 years for the 1988 murders of his parents. In 1990, Mr. Tankleff was sentenced to 50 years to life in state prison based largely on a false confession that he gave after an unMirandized interrogation.

WilmerHale partner Jennifer M. O’Connor handled several of Mr. Tankleff’s appeals beginning in 1998. Among these appeals, Mr. Tankleff’s WilmerHale defense team, alongside co-counsel also representing Mr. Tankleff pro bono, briefed and argued his 2007 appeal of the denial of his request for a new trial, which resulted in today’s reversal of Mr. Tankleff’s conviction. The new trial request was based on the testimony of new witnesses who came forward with evidence that two other men killed Mr. Tankleff’s parents.

As noted in the New York Times on December 21, 2007, four appellate justices—Reinaldo E. Rivera, Gabriel M. Krausman, Anita R. Florio and Mark C. Dillion—wrote in a unanimous, 21-page decision, “It is abhorrent to our sense of justice and fair play to countenance the possibility that someone innocent of a crime may be incarcerated or otherwise punished for a crime which he or she did not commit.”

Next steps include securing Mr. Tankleff’s release on bail while the District Attorney considers whether to try the case again.

The WilmerHale team on the case included Jennifer O’Connor, Roberto Gonzalez and Brent Gurney. Other firms involved in this lengthy case include: Baker Botts LLP, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Clifford Chance US LLP, and the Law Offices of Bruce A. Barket.

Notice

We appreciate your interest in WilmerHale. While we are pleased to have you contact us, please keep in mind that merely contacting WilmerHale does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship will not arise until the Firm agrees in writing to represent you in connection with a particular matter. Importantly, unless and until this has occurred, you should not provide us with any confidential information, and we have no duty to keep confidential any information that we may receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.