Scandalous, Immoral and Disparaging Patents in Light of Tam

Scandalous, Immoral and Disparaging Patents in Light of Tam

Publication

Omar Khan and Richard Crudo explore the potential implications of Tam in the patent context in this article published by Law360 on February 25, 2016.

The Federal Circuit sitting en banc recently held in Tam that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which prohibits the US Patent and Trademark Office from registering trademarks that “may disparage” persons, institutions, or beliefs, is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment on its face. The nine-judge majority found that trademarks generally contain some expressive content protected by the First Amendment, and that the regulation of such content “amounts to viewpoint discrimination” that fails strict scrutiny review. In so holding, the majority noted that, although the statute does not prohibit an applicant from using a disparaging mark in commerce, it does deny the “truly significant and financially valuable benefits” that federal registration bestows. The denial of such benefits, according to the majority, creates an impermissible chilling effect on speech. Read more

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.