Discovery Denied and Briefing Schedule Set in Litigation over New Patent Office Rules

Download IconDownload Print IconPrint

Discovery Denied and Briefing Schedule Set in Litigation over New Patent Office Rules

Publication

Related Solutions

Providing comprehensive solutions for the acquisition, enforcement and protection of IP.

By patenting their innovations, our clients increase the value of their intellectual property and enhance their ability to compete in the marketplace. We work with laboratory and research teams and R&D and product development groups to determine whether, when and where it is in our clients’ business and technical interests to seek patent protection. And we don’t just file patent applications. Drawing on our experience with patent litigation, corporate financings and technology transactions, we implement IP strategies that conserve resources, add measurable value and give our clients a cost-effective and commercially practical competitive edge.

We help clients obtain more than 750 US and foreign patents each year, covering innovations that span the technological spectrum, including aerospace, biochemistry, biotechnology, business methods, chemistry, computer science, fuel cells, genetics, high-speed data communication, integrated circuits, materials science, medical devices, nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals, semiconductor devices and processes, and software.

We also prepare and prosecute patent applications internationally under the Patent Cooperative Treaty and by working with a network of seasoned patent lawyers around the world. Our experience extends to appeals, interferences and opposition proceedings within the US Patent and Trademark Office, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the European Patent Office.

The plaintiffs' attempts at discovery have been denied and a schedule has been set for summary judgment briefing in the litigation over the US Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) controversial new rules regarding continuing applications and claims. The case is Tafas v. Dudas consolidated with SmithKline Beecham v. Dudas, in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

In a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 28, 2007, Magistrate Judge Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr., denied requests by the plaintiffs for discovery from the USPTO, including several depositions that had been noticed, referring to the attempts at discovery as a "classic 'fishing expedition.'" The Order also granted the defendants' motion asking the court to issue a summary judgment briefing schedule without discovery.

Briefs for summary judgment are due on December 20, 2007, as are amicus curiae briefs. Oppositions are due on January 22, 2008, and rebuttals on February 1, 2008. A summary judgment hearing is scheduled for February 8, 2008. On October 31, 2007, Judge James Cacheris granted a preliminary injunction preventing the USPTO from implementing the changes in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule on November 1, 2007, until the case could be heard on its merits. Thus, the new rules will not take effect at least until mid-February 2008, and it remains to be seen if the proposed "continuation rules" will be modified further.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.

I Accept Cancel