Strategic Considerations of Estoppel for IPRs After Shaw Industries Group v. Automated Creel Systems

Strategic Considerations of Estoppel for IPRs After Shaw Industries Group v. Automated Creel Systems

Publication

In this article published in Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, David Cavanaugh discusses how the Federal Circuit's recent opinion in Shaw Industries Group v. Automated Creel Systems may have important implications for the decision to pursue an IPR proceeding and how petitioners can best present their grounds for institution going forward.

When a patent is challenged in an inter partes review and a final written decision has been issued, a statutory estoppel will prevent certain subsequent proceedings. The scope of the estoppel, which applies to both Patent and Trademark Office proceedings and district court disputes, has been uncertain. Read the full article.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.