U.S. Philips Corporation Prevails in Decade-Long Patent Battle

Download IconDownload Print IconPrint

U.S. Philips Corporation Prevails in Decade-Long Patent Battle

Client News

Related Solutions

Providing comprehensive solutions for the acquisition, enforcement and protection of IP.

By patenting their innovations, our clients increase the value of their intellectual property and enhance their ability to compete in the marketplace. We work with laboratory and research teams and R&D and product development groups to determine whether, when and where it is in our clients’ business and technical interests to seek patent protection. And we don’t just file patent applications. Drawing on our experience with patent litigation, corporate financings and technology transactions, we implement IP strategies that conserve resources, add measurable value and give our clients a cost-effective and commercially practical competitive edge.

We help clients obtain more than 750 US and foreign patents each year, covering innovations that span the technological spectrum, including aerospace, biochemistry, biotechnology, business methods, chemistry, computer science, fuel cells, genetics, high-speed data communication, integrated circuits, materials science, medical devices, nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals, semiconductor devices and processes, and software.

We also prepare and prosecute patent applications internationally under the Patent Cooperative Treaty and by working with a network of seasoned patent lawyers around the world. Our experience extends to appeals, interferences and opposition proceedings within the US Patent and Trademark Office, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the European Patent Office.

Clients trust us to protect their most important intellectual property matters.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.

On August 30, WilmerHale client U.S. Philips Corporation won a substantial victory in a nearly decade-long battle to enforce its recordable/rewritable CD (CD-R/RW) patent rights. The victory came with the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Princo v. ITC, rejecting arguments that Philips’ licensing practices constituted patent misuse.

In a decision that will have broad-ranging implications for the patent misuse doctrine generally, the court (1) affirmed that patent misuse is a narrow doctrine applicable only to specific anticompetitive patentee conduct; and (2) recognized that an agreement between partners to a joint venture not to compete with the venture can have legitimate and pro-competitive purposes, and therefore can be condemned only upon proof of anticompetitive effects under the rule of reason.

Ed DuMont argued for Philips, with Bill Kolasky, Perry Lange and Sue-Yun Ahn on the briefs, as were former partners Doug Melamed and Jonathan Cedarbaum.

See below to read more about previous milestones in this case:

2008 Philips Prevails in Antitrust Litigation Over DVD-Player Patent Licenses

2007 ITC Decides in Favor of WilmerHale Client Philips Regarding Joint Licensing of CD-R/RW Technology Patents

2005 Major Patent Misuse/Antitrust Victory for Philips Electronics In Federal Circuit

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.

I Accept Cancel