Financial Times Article: Left in the cold: Foreign bidders find themselves out of favour

Download IconDownload Print IconPrint

Financial Times Article: Left in the cold: Foreign bidders find themselves out of favour

Firm News

Related Solutions

Bringing significant depth and critical experience to government contracting matters.
Advising clients on changing priorities, new regulations, emerging threats and untapped opportunities.
We have successfully handled a number of the most challenging CFIUS cases on record.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.
Drawing on years of experience in the public and private sectors, our lawyers handle a range of litigation involving the federal government, state and foreign governments, and complex regulatory regimes.
Insightful guidance for clients navigating the ever-complex global economy.
Jamie Gorelick discusses what it takes to work with Cfius and other government powers in foreign investment and other transactional deals

The commonly held wisdom for foreign investors, gleaned from the blocked 2006 attempt by Dubai's DP World to buy US port operations, is that the administration of President George W. Bush - which approved the deal and vociferously defended it - is a more rational actor than Congress when it comes to foreign investment, writes Stephanie Kirchgaessner.

The reality is more complex. The Treasury department is the public face of the administration on the issue, chairing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (Cfius), the executive branch panel that investigates deals on national security grounds. But, behind closed doors, companies face the toughest scrutiny from defence and intelligence agencies on the committee, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which is beefing up its expertise on foreign investment and is increasingly taking a lead in investigating sensitive deals.

"Treasury would very much like to state clearly that it's open to investment but the Department of Homeland Security, burnt by the likes of DP World, is institutionally going to be much more risk-averse. There are inherent institutional tensions," says Jamie Gorelick, a partner at WilmerHale who served as deputy attorney-general during the presidency of Bill Clinton.

To continue reading this Financial Times article, click here.

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.

I Accept Cancel