Supreme Court Rules in Favor of WilmerHale Client in Closely Watched Bankruptcy Law Case

Download IconDownload Print IconPrint

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of WilmerHale Client in Closely Watched Bankruptcy Law Case

Firm News

Related Solutions

Sophisticated knowledge of the bankruptcy process, combined with top-notch appellate and trial experience and the perspective and insight required to address a wide range of bankruptcy litigation and regulation issues.
WilmerHale has been at the forefront of complex financial restructuring and bankruptcy litigation and policy matters for decades.
A global team handling highly complex and sensitive matters in all aspects of litigation.
Combining our trial and appellate strengths allows us to shape litigation strategy from the outset to maximize the likelihood of ultimate success.

On March 22, 2017, WilmerHale earned a significant victory when the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner and WilmerHale client—a group of truck drivers formerly employed by Jevic Transportation Inc.—in Czyzewski v. Jevic, finding that so-called "structured dismissals" to end Chapter 11 cases cannot be used in a way that violates the Bankruptcy Code's priority scheme.

On behalf of the truckers, WilmerHale contended that Jevic subverted the US Bankruptcy Code's payment priority scheme when it reached a settlement in 2012 with its financial backers using a structured dismissal technique. The deal resolved the company's Chapter 11 case, but essentially wiped out employees' legal claims over hasty terminations. This case raised a fundamental and, until now, unresolved question of bankruptcy law: whether a bankruptcy court may authorize the distribution of value in a way that conflicts with the US Bankruptcy Code's priority scheme as part of a "structured dismissal" of a bankruptcy case.

The WilmerHale team included Partners Craig Goldblatt and Danielle Spinelli, who argued the case before the Supreme Court, Special Counsel Joel Millar and Associate Jonathan Seymour. The firm's co-counsel included Outten & Golden LLP and Loizides PA.

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.

I Accept Cancel