Stanford v. Roche: Supreme Court Holds Bayh-Dole Act Does Not Change Inventor's Rights in Federally Funded Inventions

Stanford v. Roche: Supreme Court Holds Bayh-Dole Act Does Not Change Inventor's Rights in Federally Funded Inventions

Speaking Engagement
To explain the significance of Stanford v. Roche and the implications for patent ownership, technology transfer, and beyond, PLI is presenting a discussion between Donald B. Ayer, a partner in the law firm of Jones Day, who argued the case on behalf of petitioner Stanford, and WilmerHale partner Mark C. Fleming, who argued the case on behalf of respondent Roche. Among other issues, the following topics will be considered: how will universities and other federal contractors respond to the Supreme Court’s decision; how will the case affect companies that collaborate with universities to commercialize inventions; what should venture capitalists and other investors know;and is the Federal Circuit’s FilmTec decision still good law?

Please view our website for more information on Stanford v. Roche.

Read More About the Event

Speakers

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.