The State of “No-Poach” Prosecution: Is It Just Like Market Allocation After All?

The State of “No-Poach” Prosecution: Is It Just Like Market Allocation After All?

Publication

In an article published in Antitrust Magazine, Partners Perry Lange and Nana Wilberforce, and Counsel Lauren Ige and John O’Toole, discuss the current state of “no-poach” prosecution by looking at cases brought by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice since issuing the Antitrust Guidance to Human Resource Professionals in October 2016.

Excerpt: "Since issuing the October 2016 Antitrust Guidance to Human Resource Professionals (“HR Guidance”) regarding potential antitrust violations in labor markets, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has been largely unsuccessful in criminally prosecuting such cases. The HR Guidance makes clear that DOJ views certain “naked” agreements that restrain competition in labor markets, including no poach and wage-fixing agreements, as criminal violations of the antitrust laws. Courts and juries in the cases tried thus far, however, have not shared that view."

Read the full article.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.