Craig Goldblatt

• Recognized as a DC leader in the bankruptcy/restructuring field in the 2005-2013 editions of Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business
• Selected by his peers for inclusion in the 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 editions of The Best Lawyers in America in the area of bankruptcy and creditor-debtor rights law
•  U.S. News Media Group and Best Lawyers 2013 states that "Mr. Goldblatt is extremely smart and thoughtful" and "is a first-rate mind, has extensive bankruptcy litigation experience, and excellent ability to relate to clients and their needs"
• Winner of the Washington Business Journal's 2008 award for the Top Washington Lawyer in the category of bankruptcy
• Listed as a Top Lawyer in bankruptcy and commercial law in Washington DC by Washingtonian magazine in 2007, 2009 and 2011
• Selected by his peers as a leading attorney in Washington DC in the 2012 and 2013 editions of Super Lawyers
• Listed as a leading bankruptcy lawyer by The American Lawyer and The Daily Deal
• Recipient of the 2007 Pro Bono Award from the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys for the firm's amicus brief in Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts

• January 17, 2013 – ABA Business Law Section, Avoidance Power Subcommittee of the Business Bankruptcy Committee – Webinar on "More Fallout from Stern v. Marshall: Ninth Circuit v. Sixth Circuit—the holding of Bellingham Insurance (9th Cir.) allows waiver of Article III adjudication conflicting with Waldman v. Stone (6th Cir)"
• October 5, 2012 – ABI Views From The Bench Conference – Panel on "Recent Decisions Addressing the Implications of Stern v. Marshall"
• September 14, 2012 – 27th Annual Mid-Atlantic Institute on Bankruptcy and Reorganization Practice – "Rules? What Rules? (The Use and Neglect of Bankruptcy Rules in Consumer Cases)"
• July 12, 2012 – US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law – "Testimony of the Effect of Stern v. Marshall on the Bankruptcy System"
• April 24, 2012 – WilmerHale/Loan Syndications and Trading Association Bankruptcy Express Webinar – Panel on "Commentary on the Supreme Court Argument in the Credit Bidding Cases"
• March 23, 2012 – ABA Business Law Section, Business Bankruptcy Committee, Bankruptcy Appeals subcommittee – Panel on "Radlax and the Right to Credit Bid in the Supreme Court"
• February 3, 2012 – American College of Bankruptcy – Panel on "The Role of the Government in Bankruptcy Cases"
• October 4, 2011 – Commercial Law League – Webinar on "Implications of Stern v. Marshall"
• September 15, 2011 – ABI Views From The Bench Conference – Presentation on the "Implications of Stern v. Marshall"
• April 16, 2011 – ABA Business Law Section, Business Bankruptcy Committee, Chapter 11 Subcommittee – Panel on "Prepackaged Bankruptcy Developments"
• April 14, 2011 – ABA Business Law Section, Business Bankruptcy Committee – Presentation on "Bankruptcy Issues Before the Supreme Court"
• April 5, 2011 – International Swaps and Derivatives Association Symposium – Panel on "ISDA Litigation in the OTC Derivatives Market," focused on developments in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy
• January 27, 2011 – NY State Bar Association, Committee on Derivatives and Structured Products – Presentation on "Issues Relating to the Treatment of Derivatives in Bankruptcy"
• October 21, 2010 – International Swasps and Derivatives Association Symposium – Panel on "Issues in Derivatives Market," focused on Swedbank v. Lehman  
• September 16, 2010 – International Swaps and Derivatives Association Symposium – Presentation on "Effect of Lehman Bankruptcy on Safe Harbors and Derivatives"
• April 29, 2010 – ABA Webinar – Teleconference on "Consequences of Supreme Court Decision in Milavetz"
• April 18, 2010 – ABA Business Law Section, Business Bankruptcy Committee, Mass Tort and Environmental Claims Subcommittee – Panel presentation on "Effect of Auto Restructurings on Mass Tort Claims"

Mr. Goldblatt's recent experience includes:

• Representing an array of swap counterparties—from large financial institutions, major hedge funds, Fortune 100 companies and public entities—in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and related litigation involving bankruptcy law’s treatment of derivatives, swap agreements and other complex financial products. Mr. Goldblatt has also represented the International Swaps and Derivatives Association as amicus curiae in appeals (in both the Lehman and Enron bankruptcy cases) in disputes related to the treatment of derivative transactions in bankruptcy.
• Representing a leading financial institution in matters relating to the servicing of mortgage loans for borrowers in bankruptcy.
• Representing Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries in dozens of bankruptcy cases filed by debtors with asbestos and other mass-tort related liabilities, including the Western Asbestos, Combustion Engineering, Federal Mogul, Skinner Engine Company and Global Industrial Technology bankruptcies and related appeals. Mr. Goldblatt prevailed in his argument before the en banc Third Circuit in Global Industrial Technologies, in which the court issued a pathmarking decision on the issue of insurer standing in bankruptcy. In describing the industry-wide significance of the string of precedent-setting cases, Chambers USA pointed out Mr. Goldblatt’s “contribution to changing the mass-tort legal landscape to the advantage of his insurance-industry clients.”
• Serving as co-counsel to the Marshall estate in Stern v. Marshall, a matter that resulted in a landmark Supreme Court decision on the scope of bankruptcy jurisdiction. Mr. Goldblatt previously represented a group of law professors as amici curiae when the case was pending before the Ninth Circuit. In that appeal, the Ninth Circuit rejected the approaches advocated by the two parties, expressly adopting the approach urged in WilmerHale’s amicus brief, which the court described as “thoughtful.” Following the Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari, WilmerHale was retained as co-counsel to Marshall estate. The Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s judgment, in a decision sharply curtailing the authority of bankruptcy courts to resolve non-bankruptcy disputes.
• Representing the Loan Syndication Trading Association in several complex bankruptcy appeals affecting the treatment of syndicated bank debt, as well as in its successful effort before the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules seeking to amend Bankruptcy Rule 2019 to prevent disclosure of proprietary information.
• Representing William Schwab, a chapter 7 trustee, before the Supreme Court in Schwab v. Reilly, No. 08-538 (decided June 17, 2010), a case involving the process by which bankruptcy trustees are required to object to debtors’ claims of exemption. Mr. Schwab retained WilmerHale during the certiorari stage before the Supreme Court, following successive adverse decisions by the bankruptcy court, the district court and the Third Circuit. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed the decisions of the lower courts.
• Successfully representing Elliott and Carol Archer in the Supreme Court (Archer v. Warner, 538 US 314 (2003)). In addition to his successful arguments in Schwab and Archer, Mr. Goldblatt has also been involved, for a party or an amicus, in most of the Supreme Court's other bankruptcy cases in recent years, including Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. United States, 559 U.S. ___ (2010); Travelers v. Pacific Gas & Elec., 549 U.S. 443 (2007); Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts 549 U.S. 365 (2007); Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006); and Rousey v. Jacoway, 544 U.S. 320 (2005).
• Representing Alcatel-Lucent, on appeal from a judgment in favor of a bankruptcy trustee for more than $335 million, arising out of the Winstar bankruptcy, on theories of preferential transfer, breach of contract and equitable subordination.
• Involvement in the firm's representation of debtors in complex and high-profile bankruptcy matters, including PSINet, Iridium, US Office Products and Kmart.